<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Des Liked: Zombie Feynman vs The Special Girl Powers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shethought.com/2010/07/28/des-liked-zombie-feynman-vs-the-special-girl-powers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shethought.com/2010/07/28/des-liked-zombie-feynman-vs-the-special-girl-powers/</link>
	<description>women.thinking.critically</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:50:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desiree Schell</title>
		<link>http://shethought.com/2010/07/28/des-liked-zombie-feynman-vs-the-special-girl-powers/comment-page-1/#comment-2010</link>
		<dc:creator>Desiree Schell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shethought.com/?p=217#comment-2010</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s exactly my impression of the issue; that the snark gets in the way of the conversation we could be having. 

It seems like there may be some kind of basis for what we know as &quot;women&#039;s intuition.&quot; It could be due to the genders finding shared patterns in their observations, or women becoming conditioned to recognize different things than men as part of our experience as being raised female. It might be possible that there&#039;s some kind neurological difference, I suppose. Or the whole idea could be one big ball of confirmation bias. I sure as heck wouldn&#039;t know, because if there have been studies done on this, they&#039;ve been hidden beyond the &quot;what a ridiculous idea&quot; -ness.

If anyone knows of a paper or two on the topic, pass it on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s exactly my impression of the issue; that the snark gets in the way of the conversation we could be having. </p>
<p>It seems like there may be some kind of basis for what we know as &#8220;women&#8217;s intuition.&#8221; It could be due to the genders finding shared patterns in their observations, or women becoming conditioned to recognize different things than men as part of our experience as being raised female. It might be possible that there&#8217;s some kind neurological difference, I suppose. Or the whole idea could be one big ball of confirmation bias. I sure as heck wouldn&#8217;t know, because if there have been studies done on this, they&#8217;ve been hidden beyond the &#8220;what a ridiculous idea&#8221; -ness.</p>
<p>If anyone knows of a paper or two on the topic, pass it on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadine</title>
		<link>http://shethought.com/2010/07/28/des-liked-zombie-feynman-vs-the-special-girl-powers/comment-page-1/#comment-1983</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shethought.com/?p=217#comment-1983</guid>
		<description>Wow! Yes! I guess I&#039;m out of the loop on SexyGate because honestly, a lot of those types of discussions are uninteresting to me - not really because of the subject matter, but more the deep, deep levels of snark that are reached during the debate.
The snark is harder to slog through than a Joseph Conrad novel. This was a well-written, well-supported response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Yes! I guess I&#8217;m out of the loop on SexyGate because honestly, a lot of those types of discussions are uninteresting to me &#8211; not really because of the subject matter, but more the deep, deep levels of snark that are reached during the debate.<br />
The snark is harder to slog through than a Joseph Conrad novel. This was a well-written, well-supported response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

