SheThought Store!

Recent Forum Posts

She Tweets


    Book Review: Jen Hancock's Humanist Approach to Happiness

    Jennifer Hancock, from her website

    Jen Hancock was kind enough to reach out to the SheThought writers and offered me a chance to read and review her book, The Humanist Approach to Happiness: Practical Wisdom. The book is aimed at teens and young adults as a way to teach ethics, critical thinking skills and decision-making to young people. If you’re more interested in the book than anything I have to say, just scroll to the end and there’s more information on the special deal she’s offering SheThought readers.

    This is perfect for me because, as someone who automatically hates everything and thinks grown-ups are stupid, I am exactly the right audience for a book aimed at teenagers.

    So I suppose that’s a good place to start. I didn’t totally hate it, but I didn’t love it either. Some parts of it were really good, and some parts really rankled. It is written in an easy to understand way with plenty of examples and metaphors that are appropriate to a younger readership. The writer clearly has a very keen memory of her teenage days and isn’t afraid to mine them for engaging examples.

    One of my bigger problems with the book came from formatting choices. There seemed to be some errors with the margins, which is fairly minor, but the author also made the decision to pepper the book with quotations from famous speakers. Now, I’m not against quotations, but giant quotations in between connected paragraphs makes me feel a little bit off kilter. When the quotes intrude, I feel the need either to read the quote and then re-figure out what I was reading or to skip the quote entirely.

    Sort of like how you’re engaging with this picture right now

    There’s a lot of great stuff, however, on what makes people “good” people, and what makes people not so good. Her three required traits are compassion, ethics, and responsibility, and these seem pretty accurate to me. She’s also happy to list bad people as well, people who generally don’t follow those three guidelines. She’s neither pro or anti-religion, at least not explicitly, and simply says that people can be good or bad regardless of faith and the only real caveat she gives in the book is that if you or someone you know is grieving, don’t assume your faith is the way they want to deal with grief. And be skeptical about supernatural claims, because that stuff is ridiculous and can get you killed!

    My favorite part is where she insists that everyone is a dork. Because we all are dorks, and the sooner we embrace it, the sooner we can move beyond lame attempts at being cool. She also thinks we should be more eager to engage in lifelong learning and learning from our elders. Amen to that. We are all dorks who should hang out with old dorks.

    And then she starts wandering a bit away from things I agree with into territory I feel a little confused about. She insists that people should aim for simplicity generally, including in their diet. Now, I’m all for simple tastes and simple lifestyles, but I am always skeptical about diet claims of any kind. Insisting on food simplicity strikes me as faddish and there are no references that make it seem like she’s making scientific claims, just personal ones. Why is a drink with chemicals worse than a drink with no chemicals? Am I really to believe that natural means healthy? I mean, arsenic is natural.

    And she goes on to really discourage people from indulging in “sinful” pleasures (her quotes). Now, I appreciate that a book aimed at a young audience isn’t going to say go try drugs and sex and rock and roll because they’re interesting and part of the human experience… except that’s exactly what I think it should say. This is clearly just a difference of opinion between the author and myself, but I feel a little confused as to how her view is the only one justified by humanism, though perhaps it isn’t trying to claim to be the only point-of-view.

    And then there’s sex. The author and I are clearly coming from totally different worlds on this one. Her advice to play the field while dating and wait for sex are things that I don’t personally find compelling, but I don’t think it’s necessarily bad advice. But when she says things like women who hate their dads transfer that hate to all men; and people who dated can’t really be friends and shouldn’t contact one another for at least a year; and, no matter what they say, women who say they’re OK with a solely sexual relationship are really just looking for an emotional relationship, whether they know it or not; and people who watch porn lose sense of reality and it’s a catalyst for bizarre violent activity and it’s addictive… when she says things like that, it is all I can do not to punch the screen. Where are the citations? Why on earth does she think this stuff?

    The book ends, however, on a high note, in a sense, about grieving. This is the best part of the book and speaks from personal experience and love. I’ve never seen much literature on the humanist perspective on grief, and this handles it gracefully.

    So, there are good and bad bits and, if you rip out the section on relationships and sex, I think the book is a great read for young adults. I think few adult readers would find it challenging, but there are still some enlightening moments to it.

    More information from the author:
    Even though the book is explicitly Humanist, I’m finding that moms of different stripes and interestingly enough, religious folk who work with teens, are interested in the book.  My book is currently in the curricula for the Royal Military College of Canada to teach cadets critical thinking and decision-making skills. It’s also going to be in the new curricula for the UUA for youth education in the areas of critical thinking and character development.  Oh, and it’s enjoying its third month atop the Kindle best seller lists for Parenting/Morals&Responsibility and Parenting/Teens.

    For a copy of the book go to: http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/22621  20% off both the ebook and the paperback formats, Coupon code: UT36F – Price will be $4.80 instead of $6.00 – this coupon expires Oct 1st 2012.

    For the paperback go to: https://www.createspace.com/3463716 and use the discount code: 2SV7A43M  20% off the list of $12.98 - so the price will be $10.38

    The book is also available at whatever online book retailer you might prefer to use.

    PS – I’ve also got a new little e-book out – Jen Hancock’s Handy Humanism Handbook – I’m giving that away free to people who sign up for my email list and the Humanist of Florida Association are giving it away free to anyone who donates to them or becomes a member.

    2 comments to Book Review: Jen Hancock’s Humanist Approach to Happiness

    • Hi Ashley – thanks for this thoughtful review of my book. I just want to clarify a couple of things that I think are misrepresented.

      1st – pornography – I don’t say people who watch porn loose their sense of reality or do violent things. I say, indulging in porn is just fine, but you need to keep in mind it is just another form of fantasy. In other words, it isn’t necessarily a good way to learn about relationships, though it may be a good way to learn a new trick or two. This is a caution about having realistic expectations for yourself and your partner(s) because “if you are trying to live up to an impossible ideal, you will always fall short, and as a result will never be happy.” I didn’t say all people have problems, I said some. And yes, some people do get addicted to porn and having known a few, I can assure you, they aren’t all that happy as individuals. They’re rather sad, as are most people struggling with addictions. As this is a book about making choices that will increase your personal happiness, I felt certain cautions about keeping your expectations realistic and not loosing yourself in a world of fantasy were in order.

      2nd. Regarding advice to teens. I feel you simplified this a bit. What I actually say is, “While Humanists hold no prohibitions on premarital sex, it is a good idea to learn the ins and outs of relationships and specifically how to deal with a broken heart before you introduce sex into your relationships.” Not that you must or should, just I think it’s a good idea. Like all advice, people should feel free to ignore it if they don’t agree with it.

      Re: the other stuff, yeah – I’m pretty opinionated in places. Comes from personal experience. And everyone’s experiences are different. The important thing for people to realize is that I didn’t write this book to be agreed with. I wrote it to be debated and discussed. The basic idea is to present Humanist values and general problem solving skills and then introduce a variety of real life scenarios to discuss how those values and problem solving skills might be applied. I honestly didn’t expect people to agree with me. Humanists rarely agree on anything even though we are working from the same basic set of principles. What I tried to do was present how I apply them with the idea that it would spur people reading the book to consider what it is they value and how they might better apply their own values to their decision making in life. And in that sense, based on your review, mission accomplished. LOL

    • avatar Simon Menanteau-Ledouble

      Thanks for this review Ashley (and, hello, Jennifer).

      I had heard a lot of very positive thing about this book and look forward to reading it myself…

    Leave a Reply

     

     

     

    You can use these HTML tags

    <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>