SheThought Store!

Recent Forum Posts

She Tweets


    The Curious Case of the Beauty Queen Bias

    Just hours ago, a close friend of mine joked that if I were only willing to go on medication for the rest of my life and didn’t care about my health so much, I could have a whole piece of cake instead of just two bites of it at his child’s birthday party. Only an hour ago, I learned that I was dropped from a cabaret show because my hourglass figure, complete with large breasts and very broad hips, was tougher to fit on short notice than the other models and one model had dropped out so a need for even numbers meant someone had to be dropped and I, the most challenging model, was the sacrifice. Sometimes things happen that we tie into our attitudes about beauty and vanity and they seem discriminatory, but they’re completely understandable. Sometimes, what might be normal human behavior is seen negatively because of context. Beauty is a subject included in that weird bias. It is through this kind of a lens that I must view the seemingly giant debate over an article by Samantha Brick.

    Samantha Brick is too pretty. Samantha Brick has felt hurt by people’s behavior because she’s pretty. Samantha Brick is now hated by masses on the internet for writing about the experience of being pretty. Shame, the internet cries, on Samantha Brick!

    I’m not a beauty queen and I wouldn’t say my appearances are better than average. That being said, part of my very well-being, my work and my success in my work, relies on my appearances. I am not a beauty queen and most people would consider Mrs. Brick a superior beauty, but I think I can see her point, a little.

    My friend’s joke was funny to me, earlier. That friend has seen me struggle, now, for over a year in a battle against my own body. His comment is a great acknowledgement of things that have become habit to me; things that are stressful and, sometimes, heartbreaking. The lady who dropped me from the Angry Woman Cabaret was also not being unkind. She was trying to be reasonable about her own presentation. But, their actions are from the perspective of those close to me or directly tied to what is going on. People who don’t know me treat these situations differently. I’ve experienced people witnessing me count calories and obsess over food calling me vain and unreasonable. There are few people who guess that I do it because I’m diabetic and controlling my health through diet and exercise. My renewed interest in exercise is seen as similarly obsessive, vain and unnecessary. While only my closest friends would otherwise have known I was taken out of a show, if it were a topic of conversation outside of my social realm, I can only guess how it would be seen. There’s not a way to explain what happened without sounding vain or maybe pathetic to strangers. I have also experienced people comment on my shape and how I dress. I won’t deny that I am vain, either. I am vain. But, I’m not a beauty stereotype, so it is often allowed, depending on the company I keep.

    So, as I ponder what I’ve read from Mrs. Brick, I can understand how what she says may not be entirely untrue. And, before people’s thoughts wander back into the question of who is beautiful or not, this isn’t about who you see as attractive. This is about how other people see her. She’s right, when someone is seen as attractive, things do happen. I’ve seen men spend unreasonable amounts of money on women based entirely on their appearance. In one of Richard Wiseman’s books, he talks about a study done that showed women with larger breasts were more likely to be helped if they were hitchhiking. I also think that there are women who become insanely jealous of others based on looks. I don’t, however, think that’s the only thing that powers what Brick was complaining about. I think that another problem is not how others view her appearance. I think it might be how others view her behavior which affects her appearance.

    As a culture, both in the United States and, I suspect, most places affected by Western culture, we have a love-hate relationship with vanity. If someone has large breasts, we are mostly fine with it. If someone purchased their large breast implants, though? Many people dislike it. Pretty eyes are a fortunate genetic accident, but pretty eyes surrounded in lots of smokey, powdery make-up is seen as excessive by some harsh critics and stylish by others.  Then there is the battle between our concept of beauty and the tipped scales. Big and beautiful is a new, fabulous trend. Confidence in a human form that is often considered unattractive because of some arbitrary line drawn in the sand about what size is attractive is wonderful, to us, at least lately. But if that same big and beautiful person suddenly becomes skinny, what happens? Confidence in herself might be seen differently. We see self-confidence differently if we see it as someone being beautiful and knowing it when they are matched to an ideal than we see it if someone is attractive and atypical.

    Interestingly, this debate also reminds me of the awful debate over the Science Cheerleader a year or so ago, when people objected to some sort of objectification rather than accepting and welcoming a different form of science advocacy. The argument was made that we couldn’t have barbie doll science. If we advocated science, we wanted it to be representative of everybody and by “everybody,” we meant the average, eccentric scientist who wasn’t a “barbie.” Many people failed to see the hypocrisy. I’m also reminded of community debates over sexiness in science, activism and general geekery. Are geeks allowed to be sexy or attractive? Aren’t we somehow buying into a culture of objectification if we are? But, as we ask those questions, we’re implying that we want to remain ignorant of the flipside. If we reject these things in our circles, aren’t we then promoting an intolerance to those who fit this stereotype? Aren’t we perpetuating the very bigotry that Samantha Brick is complaining about?

    I don’t think that what people are angry about is only that she is beautiful. I think she’s wrong that the backlash is something that proves her point. No, the backlash seems to say that people are angry that she’s beautiful and she knows it. To us, she’s too beautiful to acknowledge that she’s beautiful. She’s too beautiful to be vain. She’s too beautiful because she’s aware. That’s the crime that she shares with the Science Cheerleader and the crime that she shares with countless other women. If you’re too beautiful, we don’t want you to tell us about it and we don’t want you to use it in our social, academic or eccentric social groups. Why? Because we’re too immature to handle it.

    3 comments to The Curious Case of the Beauty Queen Bias

    • avatar kitty

      Oddly my grandmother said there was a saying “Someone that is beautiful loses a little bit of her beauty every time she opens her mouth and mentions it.”

      It seemed to be fairly common as I had other parents say it to their children.

      But haven’t heard it in my own children’s generation.

    • avatar Wendy Hughes

      It seems to me that I heard in some anthro class that certain standards of beauty were really signs of good health. Regular features, clear skin, shiny hair, all signs that the person is likely to be a transmitter of good genes, a successful hunter/gatherer – good at picking parasites out of their fur. I’m not sure where straight teeth and good vision not requiring glasses comes into this, or how some cosmetics seem to have gone into and out of fashion and back for over 3,000 years (I’m thinking of eyeliner that seems to have been fashionable among the Egyptians).
      I usually consider myself to be ordinary, not extraordinarily beautiful nor grotesquely ugly. In my boyfriend’s family, it is a sign of acceptance to be called “Ugly.” They greet one another as “UG” and when he first told me about his family, he referred to his sister, whom he loves, as his “Ugly Sister.” After about ten years, his niece referred to us as “my uncle and his ugly girlfriend” – I felt as if I had finally arrived! But I digress….
      I have a daughter who was a cute baby, and a charming toddler, but grew into a knockout teenager. She developed early; in fact, her sixth grade teacher invited me to a parent teacher conference to warn me that the boys in the class were distracted by her figure; I made an appointment to have a family counselor talk with us about this to teach her how to deal with the obsessions of others and protect herself.
      I wasn’t overwhelmed by Samantha Brick’s appearance – but I can attest that in my daughter’s experience, it’s a struggle to be recognized for one’s education and what’s going on between her ears, as well as feeling well groomed, and happy with one’s appearance. Attraction happens – I think the recent episode of Neil DeGrasse Tyson’s podcast discusses this well: http://www.startalkradio.net/?p=888
      Why fight it? But I think there is a difference between being conceited and being confident that one is well groomed and healthy.

    • I tend to think of myself as average. Nice legs, but otherwise unremarkable. Most of the time I think of my shape as “athletic.” I have a minor event coming up, one at which I will wear heels and makeup. I’m currently having an internal debate about shapewear. Because in dark moments, I think of myself as “orca-shaped.” Maybe I should just shorten my hem…. I also refuse to color my hair in order to cover up the creeping gray, so the orca analogy, except far less graceful, is apt ;)

      I tend to think of myself as smart, a good mom most of the time, funny, conscientious… and it is from here that I gain more confidence than from how I look.

      What I don’t understand is how the completely emaciated look is attractive to anyone. To Wendy’s point about healthy-looking being an indicator of good breeding partner, when I see emaciated people IRL, I immediately wonder if they are seriously physically and/or mentally ill. Does emaciation demonstrate self-control, or self-sacrifice? Why does society seem to revere that look?

    Leave a Reply

     

     

     

    You can use these HTML tags

    <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>